|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 36 post(s) |

Lynn de'Marco
Divine Power. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 23:29:00 -
[1]
i hope the system upgrades are going to be epic because those costs are insane.
assuming every system was currently held on 5 large towers as per CCPs price reasoning this is still a 4 fold price increase without even taking account that POS will still be needed to hold the jammers, jump bridges and deathstar the FLAG.
so i'm expecting ratting/mining to be 4 times as profitable with the upgrades......
|

Lynn de'Marco
Divine Power. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 23:38:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Dramaticus
this hurts smaller 0.0 alliances and anyone who wants to try and make inroads into 0.0 much more fyi
this^^
|

Lynn de'Marco
Divine Power. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 23:56:00 -
[3]
i can see NPC 0.0 gettign very well populated :)
|

Lynn de'Marco
Divine Power. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 00:57:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Lynn de''Marco on 07/11/2009 00:59:05
Originally by: ElvenLord
And that would be under assumption every player goes into belts every day for few hours, to make at least 14mil ISK daily so he can pay half to corp so corp can pay for sov. I dont think that leaves much space for some ppl to get online, get in gang and enjoy an hour or two they have of free time for pure pew pew fun or just chat. And what about ppl that are already doing a lot of work for corporations, do they need to pay too? Does eve need to become work? And if you get attacked, who is gonna make ISK for bills when you have to defend that sov?
+1, also some peopel can't play every day..... so someone who goes away for a weekend shoudl come back and have to pay 21mil to their corp?
|

Lynn de'Marco
Divine Power. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 01:12:00 -
[5]
/me getting bored of people in non 0.0 corps quoting the 7mil per member per day thing.
|

Lynn de'Marco
Divine Power. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 01:31:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Bobby Atlas CCP, you have lost the plot, truly and utterly ******ed.
Lets rehash a few things - Instead of actually fixing titans and assigning them a role, CCP replaces it with a poorly conceived "death ray". However, it was received mildly accepted after some player review but then CCP decides to give everyone supercaps on sisi which was a brilliant idea and garnered mountains of invaluable feedback (read: sarcasm )... Which resulted in the "death ray" getting nerfed to a useless state of 10 minute rof, making titans all but relegated to a POS ornament - contrary to CCP own stated intentions at fan fest to see titans used on grid but not have an instant "i own grid" button. The expectation that people will use them "because they do 2x the turret damage of a dread" is short sighted at best, considering most titan holding alliances can already field 50-100+ dreads.
- Instead of actually fixing highend passive income, ccp again chooses a poorly conceived solution that redistributes the passive income across more moons. This is but a temporary solution and 0.0 entities will simply start to react / hoard larger quantities of intermediate moons to generate roughly the same relative amount of passive income.
- Instead of actually fixing the long standing issue of poorly distributed and static true sec value of systems, ccp wimps out and decides to not touch the true sec values cause of coding complexities, similar notes are made regarding why belts will not be added to systems. Instead a system is created where by infrastructure must first be planted and upgraded to add an array of cosmic signatures that provide various additional resources. This system as it turns out through testing is not nearly as profitable nor as accommodating to the amount of players as CCP indicated it would be at fan fest, the tie in to sov mechanics, especially the loss of such upgrades when sov is lost in a system, will make upgrades a ******ed and convoluted concept.
- Dominion is supposed to make 0.0 access for smaller entities easier, this could not be further from the truth. To hold 0.0 is now going to be exceedingly cost prohibitive, if a smaller entity wants to break into 0.0 they need to generate large amounts of initial capital before they can even begin the conquest of space. The actual killer on the whole thing will be the critical mass point that makes it nearly impossible for most smaller entities; that is actually having to engage in a sov war to take some 0.0 space, the costs of a war +initial costs of sov claiming will make it so cost prohibitive that most entities are just not going to bother.
- Alliances that are based further out into 0.0 such as branch and omist for instance, are penalized much more than alliances sitting on the border of empire. CCP has been playing this whole "Balance everything" card for the last 2 months with ships, modules and skills but has turned a blind eye to the concept of distance between far out 0.0 regions and empire. For an alliance living in branch or omist, to run a JB network to empire you are talking 10bn+ a month, that is absolutely ******ed and exceedingly unbalanced.
.... I could keep going but i think the point has been made ... dominion is going to be a cluster f-u-c-k, well done CCP.
i never thought i'd do this but.......
i agree with bobby completely
|

Lynn de'Marco
Divine Power. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 02:22:00 -
[7]
isaac, your posts are well thought and articulated however:
you cannot simply run calculations of how much a corp can generate from their members.
members will not log on every day members will not want to grind isk every day they do log on members will have have other roles to carry out which occupy thier time not all members will want to make isk through taxible income
perhaps in smaller corps where you have about 10 active RL players it would be feasable to get a 7mil per day contribution from everyone but for a lot of 0.0 corps this is not feasable and not fair on all the members either.
you can do your sums "on paper" as much as you want but in practise this is not how it works out and i'm sure any director/ceo of a 0.0 corp will back me up.
|
|
|
|